NRS 425 Assignment: Community Teaching Project Part 6
NRS 425 Assignment: Community Teaching Project Part 6
Assessment Description
Teaching Experience Reflection
For this assignment, students will reflect on and evaluate their teaching presentation to determine how to improve for next time.
The Community Teaching Project has indirect care experience requirements. The “Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the Community Teaching Project and Presentation. As progress is made on the Community Teaching Project, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
In 250-500-words, describe the teaching experience and discuss the following:
Discuss one strength of the presentation.
Describe one area of opportunity for improvement. What was learned from this experience that will help in the future?
Describe the evaluation tool used by the audience to provide feedback on the teaching presentation.
Discuss the comments the audience and stakeholders provided on the presentation.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Community Teaching Project – Part 6 – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total 50 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Strengths
Discussion of one strength of the presentation.
0 points
A discussion of one strength of the presentation is not present.
9.38 points
A discussion of one strength of the presentation is present but incomplete.
9.88 points
A discussion of one strength of the presentation is present, but lacking detail.
11.13 points
A discussion of one strength of the presentation is detailed.
12.5 points
A discussion of one strength of the presentation is thorough.
Area of Opportunity
Description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations.
0 points
A description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations is not present.
13.13 points
A description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations is incomplete.
13.83 points
A description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations is present, but lacking detail.
15.58 points
A description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations is detailed.
17.5 points
A description of an area of opportunity for improvement and how this experience will help in future presentations is thorough.
Evaluation Tool
Description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback.
0 points
A description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback is not present.
3.75 points
A description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback is incomplete.
3.95 points
A description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback is present, but lacking detail.
4.45 points
A description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback is detailed.
5 points
A description of evaluation tool audience used to provide feedback is thorough.
Comments from Audience and Stakeholders
Discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation.
0 points
A discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation is not present.
9.38 points
A discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation is incomplete.
9.88 points
A discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation is present, but lacking detail.
11.13 points
A discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation is detailed.
12.5 points
A discussion of comments from the audience and stakeholders on your presentation is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1.98 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2.23 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
2.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
