FDA pharmaceutical company
Case Study. As the head of corporate audit for a major pharmaceutical company. I was involved in the lengthy approval process that the Food and Drug Administration requires. This is before a new drug can be brought to market. The reviewer for the FDA was asking some tough questions. This was about the data supporting our application to market a new drug. Although I managed to answer the reviewers questions. To his apparent satisfaction. Doubts were beginning to form in my own mind about the reliability of the data I was defending. So I instructed my staff to get photocopies of the original research reports for me as soon as possible. The photocopies provided evidence of double books. The raw data in the original reports were entirely different. This was from the data in our FDA application. It also shows the new drug failing every required test.
I had heard rumors of other questionable conduct by the project director. Also i had a suspicion that he was present in the falsification of the data. Although I had no proof for any accusations. I rejected the idea of blowing the whistle on the company by telling everything to the FDA and decided instead to follow the procedure outlined in the companys own whistle-blowing policy. Accordingly, I prepared a report stating only the facts that I could document. I then sent it to the next highest level above the person involved. Which in this situation was the legal department of the corporation. My internal whistle-blowing prompted a quick response. I was summoned to meet with the board of directors. The board had a team of lawyers from an outside firm present. The original research reports had apparently been destroyed.
Further Description
But there was no question about the authenticity of the photocopies. I still retained them because the raw data were accompanied by the researchers signatures and the dates of entry. After friendly but close questioning, the board of directors offered me a deal. They give me all of the resources that I need to get the drug approval by the FDA. But they promised that they wont market the drug. The board intended to correct the problems within the company. Also the project director soon resigned). But it wanted to avoid the embarrassment of public exposure. The boards plan was to request that approval to withdraw the drug. Afterward by telling the FDA that mistakes had been made in the marketing projections. I accepted the deal and succeeded in getting the drug approved.
The board kept its word, and 10 years later the drug is still not on the market. After my deal with the board, other changes were made. Corporate policy change so that I no longer have ready access to company records. The FDA has the authority to conduct surprise audits at any time. Also the policy had been (in the past) to allow my office to mimic FDA audits. So that the company would always be FDA-ready. Under the new policy, they must prearrange audits with the department. Also the department can stop an audit. Further reschedule it at any point. Finally, the department allows the review of the audit report before submission
To my knowledge, there has been no repetition of the events of 10 years ago. But my ability to uncover such misconduct has been severely limited. Oftentimes I wonder whether I should have accepted that deal.
Attached Files
Download |
