NURS 6050 Module 2 Week 4 Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement Assignment

Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Bills are proposed to address various public health concerns in the US. Once they are enacted to become Acts, they prevent adverse outcomes and mortalities associated with a particular public health issue. Therefore, current challenges faced by the public are the drivers of the bills to be proposed. While several bills have been proposed in the US currently, this paper will focus on the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can help you in Completing this assignment and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside, AI report alongside the assignment. Feel free to chat Us

Part 1: Legislation Grid

The selected health-related bill is the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. The bill was introduced on January 25, 2021, during the 117th Congress (2021–2023) (Govtrack, 2021). The bill is a representation of a legislative overhaul in the US addressing child welfare. This Act would require national standards for tracking and reporting child fatalities caused by maltreatment to be set by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The legislative intent of the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act will help states to address the increasing rate of child abuse and neglect in the country. This Act intends to provide the responsible authorities and organizations with funds to build strong prevention services to boost the quality of child protective services and strengthen families. In particular, this bill will authorize $270 million to be allocated to the expansion of prevention services to benefit more than 3 million children annually (Robert, 2021). Additionally, $270 million will be set aside to facilitate new research and child protective services agencies’ activities to enable them to expand services to meet the rising demand without compromising quality.

The proponent of this bill is the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This Act will guide and empower HHS in establishing national standards, which will be used in tracking and reporting child fatalities and near-fatalities caused by maltreatment. Secondly, the bill will support HHS to develop an electronic interstate data exchange system, facilitating inter-state sharing of information regarding cases of child abuse and neglect registries. The bill will also enable HHS to understand child abuse and neglect associated with substance use disorders among the family members. HHS will also learn about child sexual abuse and racial bias in the child protective services system. Finally, the bill will enable HHS to evaluate unregulated custody transfers and take the necessary actions.

This bill mainly targets children and families that have experienced maltreatment. Child abuse and neglect is a significant public health issue in the US. The country is experiencing a substantial increase in the child maltreatment rate in recent years due to the devastation of families and communities by the opioid epidemic. Thus, the bill will ensure prompt child protective services to improve children’s safety, well-being, and quality of life. Additionally, the bill will assist families in examining the root causes of these maltreatments to reduce the future’s high rate.

The Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act is currently in the first stage of the legislative process. The committee will consider this bill next before it is sent to the House or the whole Senate for their ruling.

Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement

I support the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. This bill will enhance the support of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). First, the bill will empower HHS to establish national standards for tracking and reporting child fatalities and near-fatalities caused by maltreatment. Furthermore, the bill will help HHS develop an electronic interstate data exchange system to enhance inter-state sharing of information regarding child abuse and neglect registries. The bill will also enable HHS to understand factors contributing to child abuse, such as substance use disorders among the family members. Therefore, this Act will benefit children and families who have been victims of maltreatment in the US. Additionally, it will prevent the country’s rate of child abuse from rising further in the future.

I would address the opponents by presenting facts about the proposed bill’s public health issue. The rate of child abuse in the US is rising disturbingly during the opioid abuse era. Many children are victims of maltreatment in the US. The federal government is aware of this public health concern. In particular, the government did not allocate any funds to reverse the current maltreatment trend in children. Therefore, Congress must take the necessary action to ensure this issue does not worsen in the future. The Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act will ensure the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is provided with the required support, including finances and non-monetary resources, to address this issue. Consequently, the high rate of child abuse in the country will decline.

Overall, the Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, which was introduced on January 25, 2021, during the 117th Congress (2021–2023), is among the bills that have not been enacted in the US. This bill is currently in the first stage, and the committee will next consider it before it is sent to the House or the whole Senate for their ruling. It aims at lowering the high rate of child abuse and neglect in the country.

References

Govtrack. (2021). H.R. 485 — 117th Congress: Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr485

Robert, C. (2021). The Stronger Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act: A bold, bipartisan response to the rise in child maltreatment coinciding with the nationwide opioid crisis. Fact Sheet. https://edlabor.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Fact%20Sheet_CAPTA_20190502_v08_FINAL.pdf

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

As a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.

Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.

To Prepare:

Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)

Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.

Part 1: Legislation Grid

Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:

Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:

Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.
By Day 7 of Week 4
Submit your completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

NURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Federal and State Legislation

Part 1: Legislation Grid

Based on the health-related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:

• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.

• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.

• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.

• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health-related bill.

The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.

The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill.

The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health-related bill.
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.

The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.

The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.

The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill.

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing.

Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

The description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Advocating for Legislation

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:

• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.

• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill.

Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.

A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the responses provided.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill.

Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.

An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the responses provided.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.

A vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Learning Resources Required Readings Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56) Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 180–183 only) Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/ Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.003. United States House of Representatives. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/ United States Senate. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/ United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate organization chart for the 115th Congress. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm Document: Legislation Grid Template (Word document) Required Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Working with Legislators [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Accessible player Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Health Policy and Law with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Accessible player Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities. Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Contemporary Issues in Public Health Policy with Joel Teitelbaum [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Accessible player Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Population Health [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Order Messages Order Revision Remarks

Services

Site Policy