July 29, 2024

Learning Objectives Students will: · Evaluate scholarly articles for a literature review · Analyze scholarly literature for evidence · Evaluate quality of evidence to inform practice change · Synthesize research to support nursing practice problems · Synthesize evidence to inform practice change. Evaluate scholarly articles Components of Evidence-Based Practice: This final component of evidence-based practice […]

EVALUATE SCHOLARLY ARTICLES 2023 BEST Read More »

EVALUATE SCHOLARLY ARTICLES 2023 BEST

Essay writing

1. George Smith, a 55-year-old patient is admitted to the intensive care unit after a thoracotomy approach was used for an esophagectomy to remove an early stage adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. The patient has a history of GERD and Barrett’s esophagus. The patient sought medical treatment for dysphagia with solid foods,

and the development of hiccups. The patient has no other medical problems. (Learning Objectives 6 Read More »

and the development of hiccups. The patient has no other medical problems. (Learning Objectives 6

Essays

In a paper, address the following issues and questions: Support your paper with a minimum of five (5) scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

In a paper, address the following issues and questions: Support your paper with a minimum of five (5) scholarly resources. In Read More »

In a paper, address the following issues and questions: Support your paper with a minimum of five (5) scholarly resources. In

Essays

3 pages In , identify at least one landmark legal case or court decision for each of these important psycholegal areas: CST, criminal responsibility (MSO), the right to mental health treatment, the right to refuse psychiatric treatment, coercion to mental health treatment, and participation in treatment and civil commitment of sex offenders. Critically analyze the

The essence of a court decision involves two things: (1) the issue under dispute and Read More »

The essence of a court decision involves two things: (1) the issue under dispute and

Essays

The prompt states: Adequately, discuss the following forensic science/criminalists concepts: 1. Five (5) historical persons who made contributions to the science 2. three (3) main categories (Field, Lab, Medical) in the science 3. Eight (8) crime scene investigation steps 4. Addiction and its effect on the criminal justice system 5. Fingerprints 6. Classroom security (The

who made contributions to the science 2. three (3) main categories (Field, Lab, Medical) in Read More »

who made contributions to the science 2. three (3) main categories (Field, Lab, Medical) in

Essays

•Discuss Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness strategies to build government connectivity by Leonard J. Marcus, Barry C. Dorn, and Joseph M. Henderson.  ?Do you agree with authors’ grounds, reasoning, claims and recommendations? Why? If not, why not? 300 words    •Respond to at least two fellow classmates’ posts. 150 words for each.

•Discuss Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness strategies to build government connectivity by Leonard J. Marcus, Barry C. Dorn, and Joseph M. Henderson. ?Do you agree with authors’ grounds, reasoning, claims and recommendations? Why? If not, why Read More »

•Discuss Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness strategies to build government connectivity by Leonard J. Marcus, Barry C. Dorn, and Joseph M. Henderson. ?Do you agree with authors’ grounds, reasoning, claims and recommendations? Why? If not, why

Essays