NR 433-Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ
NR 433-Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NR 433-Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ .
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
By Day 7 of Week 7
Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
· Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
· Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
· Click the Week 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Required Readings
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
· Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188)
· Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper—examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NR 433-Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ .
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010c). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ
Preferred articles peer reviewed articles , pls two from this group
#1. Al Danaf, J., Chang, B. H., Shaear, M., Johnson, K. M., Miller, S., Nester, L., & Aboumatar, H. J. (2018). Surfacing and addressing hospitalized patients’ needs: Proactive nurse rounding as a tool. Journal of nursing management, 26(5), 540-547. Retrieved from https://doi-org/10.1111/jonm.12580
Article#2. Kirk, K., & Kane, R. (2016). A qualitative exploration of intentional nursing round models in the emergency department setting: Investigating the barriers to their use and success. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25 (910), 1262-1272.
https://doi-org./10.1111/jocn.13150
Article#3 Morgan, L., Flynn, L., Robertson, E., New, S., Forde‐Johnston, C., & McCulloch, P. (2017). Intentional rounding: a staff‐led quality improvement intervention in the prevention of patient falls. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(1-2), 115-124. Retrieved from
https://doi-.org/10.1111/jocn.13401
Preferred Systemic reviewed articles, please critically appraise two from this group
Article #4 Christiansen. A., Coventry, A., Graham, R., Jacob, E., Twigg. D. & Whitehead, L.(2018).
Intentional rounding in acute adult healthcare settings: A systematic mixed-method review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 27(9-10) p.1759-1792. https://doi-org/10.1111/jocn.14370
Article #5 Sims, S., Leamy, M., Davies. N., Schnitzier, K., Levenson,,R., Mayer, F., Grant, R., Gourlay, S., Ross, F., & Harris, R (2018). Realist synthesis of intentional rounding in hospital wards: Exploring the evidence of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why. BMJ Quality and Safety 9 (743-752). https://doi-org.10.1136/brmjqs-2017-006757
Article #6Toole, N., Mekuskey, T., & Hall, N. ( 2016). A systemic review :barriers to hourly rounding.
Journal of Nursing Management 24(3),283-290. https://doi-org/10.1111/jonm.12332
¨
SAMPLE OF TEMPLATE
( Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template )
Evaluation Table
Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NR 433-Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence DQ .
